By Steven & Evan Strong
In one of our most recent articles posted, we comprehensively dismissed the credentials of the six mainstream reasons as to why the Kariong Hieroglyphs are a recently constructed prank/hoax. The three sandstone walls, found deep in the bush at a very remote post, contain close to three hundred hieroglyphs and do look, at first glance, decidedly Egyptian. Officially decreed fake, with at least four different sets of people or one individual deemed responsible, no motive is given, profit suggested, in fact any and all of these pretenders only share one common feature: anonymity. No name, address, court charge, photograph, statuary declaration or video is produced as evidence, it is all down to what just doesn’t fit into current models of the human past in ancient times.
Photo by Evan Strong
It is a flimsy charade easily dispensed with, all that is needed is to look away from the pros and cons involved in assessing whether the glyphs on the walls are authentic, pause for a second and look down to the earth, as one wise Original woman did some thirty years ago when standing beside those same engravings.
Another Original Truth
The pendant found by highly respected Original Elder, Aunty Minnie Mace, lying in the earth floor between the Kariong hieroglyphs, was originally thought to be an Egyptian product. Aunty Minnie was accompanying the first non-Original person to record the glyphs and liaise with Egyptian experts, Ray Johnson, at a time when very few people knew they existed. While on site she felt drawn to what appeared to be a solid clump of hard earth, even though it had no right to be given special privileges, she told us she intuitively knew there was more to this object than what met the eye.
It took her half an hour to clean away the thick coat of dirt. Beneath the protective coat was a metal object with a complete circular clasp which presumably held a chain that was strung around the neck. Unfortunately, a younger member of the family wore a necklace displaying this ancient treasure at a dance and through misfortune or a poor sense of rhythm, contact was made and the upper edge of the clasp broke away. Understandably, as it was found beside what is acknowledged through cat-scan analysis to be an extremely ancient piece of human bone, and was positioned less than five metres from hieroglyphs that make reference to unexpected death and nearby interment of Nefer-Ti-Ru (son of Khufu), there was no reason not to expect that it was also of Egyptian origin.
We held to the belief it was Egyptian and saw no alternative on any horizon, until it was scientifically analysed about six months ago. The results have made it clear that this metal object was never made in Egypt. However, it doesn’t end there, as it doesn’t belong to anywhere else on this planet. This artefact was found to have two identifiable elements that make up 76% of the compound, Aluminium is the major element and accounts for 73% of the object and the other 3% is Copper. What is left over cannot be determined, the laboratory found 24% of what lay within is unknown. Because of this analysis there are two problems in attributing any Earthy origin, there is no Aluminium alloy manufactured anywhere on this planet, before or since, that has less than 85% Aluminium, and this is 12% below the minimum standard. This metal only came into common usage after World War 2 and there is no alloy yet made on this planet that has one quarter of the content unidentifiable and is much harder than any present combination.
Photo by Samarah Wood
Moreover, with no deposit of Bauxite in ancient or modern Egypt to mine, this piece of jewellery cannot be Egyptian and is most likely well ahead of its time. Is it evidence of earlier advanced technology spoken of in civilisations like Atlantis and Lemuria? Or, what if this compound contains material that came from other planets and constellations? That’s it, there is nothing left on the table if relying on conventional accounts explaining how humans evolved and spread their ‘seed.’ There are no other logical possibilities, it can’t be Egyptian and has no known precedent or composition which leaves us with one of two answers, looking way back into the ancient past or up into the night-time skies. From that station it is a simple matter of one of these locations has to be right. Either one makes no difference, that still means so much of what is assured to be factual about our gradual evolution from ‘cave-man’ ignorance by degrees leading on to the present day pinnacle in all the facets of humanity we see today, is fundamentally wrong.
Steven Strong is a secondary school teacher with a background in Aboriginal archaeology and education. He co-wrote two units of the Master of Aboriginal Studies program for Sydney University and the New South Wales Department of Education. Evan Strong has bachelor of social science degree with majors in psychology/archaeology-anthropology/sociology and counseling.